Thursday, August 23

Get Identified With Spotify

How can you possibly not love the streaming music service known as Spotify? They boast 32.8 million registered users at the end of 2011 according to The Journal. Spotify, which came to the United States a year ago, is available in 15 countries and is expanding quickly. It offers streams of millions of songs free, with advertising, or without ads for monthly subscriptions of about $5 to $10. Last month, the company said that 15 million people logged on each month and that four million were paying subscribers, but it did not break those numbers down by country. That is kind of impressive.

Musicians who may side eye the service really need to do their research and support. I've listed 5 reasons Spotify is not to be denied.

#1. Growing Consumer Preference for Streaming Media
While many in the music industry have finally come to accept paid MP3 downloads, a growing number of consumers have already moved past the paid download model and prefer streaming media. Sadly, there is a whole generation of consumers that are not used to paying for recorded music at all. Those who want to own music can simply choose to pirate any and every song they desire.

Streaming typically provides much easier access to music then downloads. The first place my middle school age kids and their friends go to check out a new band they’ve heard about is not iTunes but YouTube. And these kids strongly prefer a smartphone, iTouch or iPad as their primary way to access the web and media.
Spotify’s ability to seamlessly stream their catalog of music plus an individual’s MP3 collection to smartphones comes very close to giving music fans what they’ve always wanted, unlimited and instant access to the world’s music.

Give consumers what they want and they will gladly pay for it.

#2 Discoverability
An indie musician’s number one challenge, without a doubt, is the opportunity to be heard by potential fans.  Spotify makes it easy for users to discover new music and check out the latest music recommendations from friends or bloggers.  Spotify users have virtually no obstacles to checking out bands they’ve heard about or have even a minor interest in hearing. Removing obstacles to music discovery is a good thing for indie musicians. Having your music heard is the first step towards building a new fan relationship.

Although the details are still emerging, Spotify’s new partnership with Facebook initially seems to represent an unprecedented opportunity for indie musicians to be heard.  The ability of 700 Million Facebook users to easily share their favorite songs, albums, bands and playlists with their Facebook friends could potentially turn out to be a much more powerful publicity tool than any influential magazine, radio station, disc jockey or TV show in the history of the recorded music industry.

#3 Monetization
The Spotify monetization story for indie artists is a struggle. Royalties on a per stream basis for indie artists are anemic at best. However, if Spotify successfully gains mass consumer adoption the royalty payouts can potentially become meaningful for many artists.

Additionally, If Spotify can successfully ramp up their user base I fully expect to see them add additional user features such as personalized tour alerts and the ability to buy concert tickets and /or band merchandise. Should these types of end user features be added in the future they can certainly help generate incremental revenue for indie artists.

#4 Monthly Reoccurring Revenue Models Rock (in the long run)
It is possible for a reoccurring monthly revenue model like Spotify’s to potentially generate a superior customer lifetime value metric for the recorded music industry than the current pay per unit pricing model approach. Consumers that pay $10 / month, every month for unlimited access to music will ultimately end up paying more of their disposable income for music than today’s average music consumer that purchases recorded music on a per unit basis.

Keep in mind there are currently 70 Million smartphones users in the United States. If Spotify gains a double-digit adoption rate among smartphone users their monthly reoccurring revenue model can generate substantial and long-term music industry revenues and creator royalties.

#5 The Majors Labels Do Not “Own” Spotify
It’s important to know that the major labels only have a minority ownership position in Spotify. There are several published reports citing a combined 18% ownership stake for the major labels. This equity position was no doubt one of the requirements for Spotify’s access to the major label music catalogs.

From a corporate governance perspective control of a company typically requires a minimum 51% ownership of all outstanding shares. Even if the major labels have board level representation they have no authority over the company’s day-to-day operations.

Additionally, most start-up and high growth technology companies like Spotify do not pay dividends to their shareholders even when they eventually become profitable. Like their other investors, until Spotify goes public or is acquired it is unlikely the major labels will be generating any significant cash flow from the company (outside of their per stream royalties).

Source: KnowTheMusicBiz

We want to know your take... leave a comment below.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Type Comments Here...